Today's hottest deals

MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics230% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E26
MotherboardMSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20241022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 20:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$259
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 206
2-Core 408
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 763
8-Core 1,301
125% 1,032 Pts
64-Core 1,969
122% 1,969 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
Gigabyte(1458 240C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
230% Outstanding
Lighting 297
Reflection 410
Parallax 618
242% 442 fps
MRender 417
Gravity 227
Splatting 439
302% 361 fps
Poor: 176%
This bench: 230%
Great: 249%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK51.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,198
Write 2,656
Mixed 2,591
558% 2,482 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 84.7
285% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 2,070
DQ Write 1,565
DQ Mixed 1,861
1,380% 1,832 MB/s
Poor: 237% Great: 518%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$115
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
149% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 51.8
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 50.7
SC Write 55.6
SC Mixed 49.2
148% 51.8 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 149%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 42% 19 540 446 60 24.5" 1920 1009 AUS25AC VG259QR
Typical B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26) Builds (Compare 601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E26)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $1,254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback