Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VH (MS-7B33)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B33
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VH (MS-7B33)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 20:43
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 611
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.1% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 37
28% 36.8 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 26.3
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 105 104 103 104 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 427
Write 196
Mixed 320
SusWrite 131
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 34.7
136% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 201
175% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G240081 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 22.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical H310M PRO-VH (MS-7B33) Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VH (MS-7B33)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback