Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 20:16
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$146
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 68.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 959
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,396
86% 1,396 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 110
Parallax 87.2
100% 106 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 111
Splatting 102
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 443
Mixed 439
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 51.3
170% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 175
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
379GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 78.1
Write 82
Mixed 32
SusWrite 80.9
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GTZR BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 13.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1920 1009 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 4,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback