Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 20:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 361
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-6GB
Asus(1043 8976) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Above average
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 75.6
64% 86.9 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 59.2
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G3B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 376
Write 418
Mixed 345
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 36.2
125% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82.8
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 144
123% 173 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 82%
Maxtor 6V200E0 204GB
292GB free
Firmware: VA111630
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 58 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 59.4
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.3
125% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M8FE CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.1% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 100 21.5" 1600 837 ACR0B5D EK221Q H
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $565
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback