Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 day ago, 1 day ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 19:52
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$470
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 98.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,102
107% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,497
93% 1,497 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 177
Parallax 168
116% 162 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 113%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 264 168 158 154 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 459
Mixed 414
SusWrite 233
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.2
212% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 117%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
627GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 475 473 473 474 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 470
Mixed 414
SusWrite 462
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.7
188% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 290
241% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
142GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 476 476 477 476 476 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 480
Mixed 448
SusWrite 476
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 57.7
201% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 298
246% 352 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 129%
Great: 123%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
560GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3041 1798 1817 1819 1810 1816 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
406% Outstanding
Read 2831
Write 2,787
Mixed 3,026
SusWrite 2,017
601% 2,665 MB/s
4K Read 77.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 110
360% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,428
DQ Write 1,136
DQ Mixed 1,246
942% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 406%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2321 2324 2322 1813 1429 1482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 2,349
Mixed 1,924
SusWrite 1,949
498% 2,219 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 93
313% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,415
DQ Write 1140
DQ Mixed 1,261
948% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 379%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 45.1
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 34.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 44.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 41.1
97% 41.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 5R 9G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 14% 83 216 58 144 27" 2560 1369 GSM5B7F LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 24: 0P 2R 2G 8B | Score 60: 0P 5R 9G 8B
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 14,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback