Today's hottest deals

MSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B24
MotherboardMSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 19:41
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 240
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 666
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 107
Parallax 119
94% 114 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 108
Splatting 100
100% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 429 435 441 345 430 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 454
Mixed 311
SusWrite 413
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 40
140% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 266
225% 327 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
290GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 144 142 145 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 139
Write 97.5
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 143
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
206GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 140 121 170 187 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 132
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 17 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07C5 SAMSUNG
Typical B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 5,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M BAZOOKA (MS-7B24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback