Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 19:40
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 49.5
2-Core 92.9
41% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 237
24% 195 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 55.7
45% 57.8 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 48.6
39% 47 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 851 898 902 159 951 520 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 980
Mixed 858
SusWrite 714
191% 844 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 389
292% 390 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 181%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
211GB free
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.4 8.6 8.4 8.6 8.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3330MJ78HBF-3200 Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.5% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 25% 20 202 55 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP301F HP LA2405x
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback