Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS_W550  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1824x1026x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 19:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 193
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 573
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 35.3
27% 35.6 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 35.6
Splatting 25.2
26% 32 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 117 108 110 111 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 146
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 110
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
366GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 139 138 140 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 175
Mixed 85
SusWrite 138
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1G43EB1-CPB Kingston 9905678-027.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.6% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 0R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 38% 24 213 58 60 0.7" 1280 720 VES3700 22W_LCD_TV
Typical CELSIUS_W550 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback