Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardVMware, VBSA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3024 x 1890 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 19:13
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Apple silicon
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 50
1-Core 125
2-Core 252
74% 143 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 472
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0406) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.7.4
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Lighting 101
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 453
82% 205 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 45.4
35% 42.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 69GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,270
Write 2,525
Mixed 2,353
534% 2,383 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 40.5
162% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 286
226% 309 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-4096MB 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 75.7
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 49.5
158% 55.5 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 36.4
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 141%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 3R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 16% 25 180 54 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback