Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 AQUA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 385%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 470%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics384% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 days ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 AQUA  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 18:38
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 178
2-Core 344
107% 201 Pts
4-Core 682
8-Core 1,334
119% 1,008 Pts
64-Core 2,815
174% 2,815 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Nvidia(10DE 16F3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3315 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
384% Outstanding
Lighting 610
Reflection 587
Parallax 830
497% 676 fps
MRender 524
Gravity 595
Splatting 301
370% 473 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 384%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 486 456 481 479 482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 2,385
Mixed 1,676
SusWrite 485
357% 1,586 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 71.3
232% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,507
DQ Write 1,116
DQ Mixed 1,246
949% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 232%
Great: 374%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
364GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3161 3727 3711 3293 925 885 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 3,573
Mixed 2,122
SusWrite 2,617
586% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 72.4
236% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,399
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,273
947% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 369%
Great: 486%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3511 3587 3598 3595 2810 926 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
387% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 3,250
Mixed 2,127
SusWrite 3,004
593% 2,611 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.8
215% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,187
899% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 387%
Great: 500%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 55.1
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 46.4
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 43.4
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 132%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 31.5" 1280 720 LEN66F9 Y32p-30
Typical X570 AQUA Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 194%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 232%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 AQUA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback