PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z590 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210115 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 31 '24 at 18:37 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-11400-$127
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 149 153 155 156 MB/s
|
77.9%
Very good
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
182GB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 35 35 35 35 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3560 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 31.5" | 1280 720 | AOC3202 32G2WG8 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-11600KIntel $181Bench 99%, 43,966 samples | 365x |
Core i7-11700KIntel $230Bench 101%, 65,651 samples | 294x |
Core i9-11900KFIntel $235Bench 104%, 17,778 samples | 174x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $282Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 311x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 195x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 166x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $520 |