Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFX14-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 day ago, 1 day ago.
SystemAcer Swift SFX14-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Orion_CA
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220802
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 65.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 285
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1009
95% 787 Pts
64-Core 1,250
77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1536) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 32.6
20% 25.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 21.6
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1114 1TB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 664 791 652 673 539 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,480
Write 1,017
Mixed 962
SusWrite 648
229% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 36
128% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 262
232% 366 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 157%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 14" 1280 720 AUO683D
Typical Swift SFX14-41G Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFX14-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback