Today's hottest deals

Biostar H310MHG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 day ago, 1 day ago.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHG  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 479
64% 479 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 70.3
58% 72.1 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 65.1
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 58 59 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 42.1
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8313 CL19-19-19 D4-2666 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 15.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 7.2" 1862 985 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical H310MHG Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback