Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 18:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$191
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 198
2-Core 393
117% 224 Pts
4-Core 786
8-Core 1,370
130% 1,078 Pts
64-Core 2,310
143% 2,310 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$709
Asus(1043 8823) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 268
Reflection 252
Parallax 306
219% 276 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 227
Splatting 171
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
501GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8B40103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 748 644 1586 440 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1,522
Mixed 949
SusWrite 714
251% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 25.6
211% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 451
456% 722 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 193%
Great: 246%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
359GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 447 434 434 431 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 450
Mixed 346
SusWrite 436
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 41.5
141% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 230
201% 302 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 118%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 108 106 102 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 82
SusWrite 106
137% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.6
250% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.5
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 31.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 34" 1280 720 XMI3446 Mi Monitor
Typical TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 4,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback