Today's hottest deals

Inet_ab B550M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive393% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
SystemInet_ab B550M-HDV  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B550M-HDV
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 17:36
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,186
105% 890 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$295
Device(1771 1801) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 4350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 135
Parallax 163
141% 157 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
120% 153 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3089 3272 2617 2900 1261 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 2,425
Write 4,543
Mixed 3,324
SusWrite 2,202
710% 3,123 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 109
364% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1,088
812% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 270%
This bench: 393%
Great: 601%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
508GB free, PID 01f0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 130 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 70
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 130
125% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 42.7
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 41.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 41.4
97% 41.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 240 27" 1920 1009 AUS278F VG279QM
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback