Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0EX00ETIN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0EX00ETIN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 371D
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 17:32
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 41.2
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 84.9
36% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 74.2
8-Core 83.5
10% 78.8 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 371D) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.50.18
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.9
2% 4.43 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 7.8
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Generic 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 187 205 201 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 141
Write 196
Mixed 175
SusWrite 198
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 6.4
29% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.6
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 26.1
30% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 69%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
545GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 33 34 33 33 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 8.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 31.2
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 3.8 4.1 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.3
9% 9.27 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 5.7
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 1 60 21.5" 1920 1009 LENF918 LEN-A350-C-A
Typical F0EX00ETIN Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo F0EX00ETIN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback