Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 17:16
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 181
2-Core 338
111% 205 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 971
86% 727 Pts
64-Core 2,307
143% 2,307 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 179
Parallax 178
89% 156 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 123
Splatting 80.1
80% 99.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 893 896 897 857 830 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,747
Write 2,560
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 901
453% 2,025 MB/s
4K Read 78.3
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 112
385% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,572
DQ Write 1,295
DQ Mixed 1,365
1,041% 1,411 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 348%
Great: 340%
WDC WD40EFPX-68C6CN0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 126 125 125 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 116
Mixed 150
SusWrite 125
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1.4
31% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 2.6
3% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N1 4TB
883GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 99.2
22% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.1
52% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 142 140 141 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 109
SusWrite 139
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 84%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB
1TB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 95 95 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 60
SusWrite 95.7
122% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 71.9
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 46.1
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 32.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 43.7
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 144%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5BC9 LG FHD
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $692
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback