Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 16:44
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 239
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 645
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 67.9
53% 66.9 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 61.9
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 72 17 164 87 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 410
Write 333
Mixed 271
SusWrite 85.7
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 11.5
50% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 29.4
38% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 157 158 158 157 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 102
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 155
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 96%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
109GB free, PID 0cd1
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 57 57 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 126
Write 58.7
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 55.8
75% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 6.1
489% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 215 57 60 0.7" 1280 720 FNI0000 LCD TV
Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback