Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING DDR4  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime10 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 14:53
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$77
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 299
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 818
82% 669 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 106
Parallax 91.9
77% 97.7 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 86.4
Splatting 94
75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 48 32 9.5 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
187GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 115 114 116 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 115
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 36.3
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 5% 40 212 57 72 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical GA-B760M GAMING DDR4 Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback