Today's hottest deals

Asus N552VW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N552VW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N552VW
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 14:33
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 169
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 485
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1D8D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.5 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.5
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMD1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 846
Write 956
Mixed 917
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 33.3
128% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 175
198% 343 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 226%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 136 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 130
Write 96.8
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 134
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 54 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD046F
Typical N552VW Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N552VW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback