Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HF
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240311
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 04:19
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 64.6
30% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 206
21% 168 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3088) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.3% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 997 184 214 252 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,204
Write 1,358
Mixed 1,143
SusWrite 492
236% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 29.7
103% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 171
141% 203 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 120%
Great: 253%
Nvme PCIe SSD 512GB
426GB free
Firmware: EDFMF0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1296 1372 1224 1388 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 739
Write 1,389
Mixed 973
SusWrite 1,177
243% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 33.1
113% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 254
192% 259 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 148%
Great: 242%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N Lexar Co Limited LD4AS008G-3200ST 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.6% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 28.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 6.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF Builds (Compare 968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HF_FX506HF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback