Today's hottest deals

Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 04:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$106
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 782
83% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,090
68% 1,090 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
XFX(1EAE 6502) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 140
Parallax 229
93% 161 fps
MRender 219
Gravity 122
Splatting 181
142% 174 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 1TB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0621B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 73 70 66 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 498
Write 389
Mixed 393
SusWrite 63.4
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 23
127% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 11.3
41% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$52
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 29.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 25" 1920 1080 ACR0A6C KG251Q S
Typical H510M-HDV/M.2 SE Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock H510M-HDV/M.2 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback