Today's hottest deals

MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 04:14
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$118
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 160
2-Core 304
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 918
91% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$296
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 109
Parallax 160
132% 144 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
112% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$60
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 88 86 78 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 245
Write 126
Mixed 176
SusWrite 85.7
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 22.1
82% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 30.6
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 36.7
34% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 73%
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
55GB free
Firmware: E8FK12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 596
Write 706
Mixed 311
120% 538 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 24.3
116% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 384
337% 510 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 157%
WD Game Drive 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 103 104 103 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 124
Write 81
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 103
123% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
154% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$52
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 24
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 24
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 240 27" 1920 1057 DELA147 Dell AW2720HF
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback