Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 03:23
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 665
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B 250GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 423
Mixed 265
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 33.6
115% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 258
205% 285 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
WDS100T2G0A 1TB
357GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 399
Mixed 402
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 21
98% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 37.2
93% 190 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 97%
Apacer AS340 120GB
31GB free
Firmware: AP613PE0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 476
Write 220
Mixed 292
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 28.7
122% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 175
151% 222 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 23.9
39% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
149% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$52
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 30.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 75 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback