Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-dw1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-dw1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85F1
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 14 '24 at 06:19
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 6405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 133
58% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 188
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 85F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 3.3
2% 3 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPZX-08Z10 500GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 82 94 88 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 94.4
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 81.9
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hewlett-Packard 2E2M5AA# Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 18% 38 76 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE076F
Typical Laptop 15-dw1xxx Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-dw1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback