Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 141 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 441 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 175 Parallax 194 96% 163 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 193 Splatting 133 123% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150 2,567 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 13031 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1500 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 143 (AE) Unknown 100 100 94 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 476 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1195 (F1) Unknown 100 100 27205556753 (F2) Unknown 100 100 25721782206	33.2% Below average	Read 471 Write 48.4 Mixed 171 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 9.26 4K Mixed 5.25 37% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 8.59 DQ Mixed 5.1 7% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 54%
Seagate ST1500DM003-9YN16G 1.5TB 5,186 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 28688648 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 931 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 61 60 4296344760 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7888 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 919 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 45 504627230 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 55057 (C2) HDA temperature 30 55 64424509470 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -60696477821485 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6817703534308 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4826331330654	92.3% Outstanding	Read 155 Write 167 Mixed 94.4 103% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 103%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 279GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 128 124 6566 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4052 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12814 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1928 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 258 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 47646 (C2) HDA temperature 116 87 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	33.6% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 49.4 Mixed 57 44% 58.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.09 42% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 59%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 33GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 157 5108 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4721 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24362 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3221 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 529 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4656 (C2) HDA temperature 113 83 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.3% Below average	Read 73.3 Write 63.3 Mixed 76.6 54% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.7% Average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16