Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateOct 06 '24 at 13:49
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 167
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 397
45% 353 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
Sapphire(1DA2 E451) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 83.7
Reflection 128
Parallax 159
68% 124 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 152
118% 144 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$47
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 199 368 400 399 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 617
Write 978
Mixed 1,193
SusWrite 334
177% 780 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 46.8
153% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 398
289% 378 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 109%
Great: 253%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
35GB free
Firmware: 030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 462
Write 409
Mixed 379
SusWrite 12.7
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 21.3
101% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 0.3
70% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 100%
Intel Raid Volume 2TB
219GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 101 88 87 73 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 61.6
Write 62.9
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 81.7
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.1
134% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 30.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 75 24.5" 1920 1027 IVM6133 PL2530H
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback