Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55M-UD2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:47
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$290
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 355
39% 306 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1557) 1GB
CLim: 981 MHz, MLim: 1128 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 11.1
9% 12.5 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 11.4
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 87 78 66 86 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 190
Write 127
Mixed 122
SusWrite 85.6
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 13
45% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 18.5
17% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 48%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
287GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 75 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 76.8
Write 76.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 76.7
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
243GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 71 69 71 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 72.4
Write 72.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 69.6
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 71 69 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 111
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 69.6
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 PKB5064 PKB VIS220WS
Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback