Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:47
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$349
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 210
2-Core 404
121% 232 Pts
4-Core 788
8-Core 1,553
138% 1,171 Pts
64-Core 2,749
170% 2,749 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
PowerColor(148C 2423) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
238% Outstanding
Lighting 305
Reflection 442
Parallax 624
248% 457 fps
MRender 463
Gravity 246
Splatting 438
317% 383 fps
Poor: 176%
This bench: 238%
Great: 249%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 1TB
588GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3532
Write 3,302
Mixed 2,613
701% 3,149 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66.7
234% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,005
DQ Write 1,504
DQ Mixed 1,700
1,286% 1,736 MB/s
Poor: 243% Great: 594%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
231% Outstanding
MC Read 118
MC Write 67.9
MC Mixed 78.1
252% 88 GB/s
SC Read 49.1
SC Write 74.9
SC Mixed 57.5
173% 60.5 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 231%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback