Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 883C
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240508
Uptime5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:46
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 213
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 471
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 883C) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 14.9
11% 13.4 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1
0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 171 181 170 197 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 873
Write 189
Mixed 239
SusWrite 179
80% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 27.2
105% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 202
173% 264 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 91%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0613 SyncMaster
Typical Laptop 17-cn0xxx Builds (Compare 1,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback