Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:09
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 256
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 744
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
PowerColor(148C 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 210
Parallax 226
90% 182 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 122
Splatting 177
137% 167 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 115%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,926
Write 1,688
Mixed 1583
386% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 48.2
165% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 912
671% 888 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 29.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 5 165 23.8" 1920 1080 BNQ7FCC BenQ EX240N
Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2 Builds (Compare 3,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback