Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFG14-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Coral_RTH
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 62.3
1-Core 189
2-Core 348
103% 200 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 929
97% 779 Pts
64-Core 1278
79% 1278 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1699) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 16.9
12% 17.9 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 17.3
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2329
Write 2,143
Mixed 1,519
444% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 43.5
257% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,141
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 735
641% 955 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 285%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
131% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 48.6
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 22.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 131%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 0R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 55% 11 143 57 90 14" 1280 720 SDC4181
Typical Swift SFG14-71 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acer Swift SFG14-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback