Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:03
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 62.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 200
68% 123 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 632
60% 500 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 22.6
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.6
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 64 187 48 19 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 1,017
Mixed 952
SusWrite 141
197% 889 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 41.5
127% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 466
DQ Mixed 252
266% 442 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 130%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 1R 2G 14B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 14% 124 154 57 144 15.5" 1920 1009 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FX506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback