Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210803
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 15:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 97
42% 70 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 99.7
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 94.5
6% 94.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 12.3
6% 9.4 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 7.9
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-960 960GB
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12574
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 317 304 320 183 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 323
Write 339
Mixed 329
SusWrite 255
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 23.4
95% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 179
127% 162 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 97 98 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 88
Write 101
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 97.2
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CVF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 2.9
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 3R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 31% 49 86 13 120 27" 1600 900 SAC2700 HDMI
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback