Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook Go E1404GAB_E1404GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1404GAB_E1404GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1404GAB
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 14:06
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 31.8
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 113
36% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 372
46% 350 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3168) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.1
6% 6.07 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 462 466 450 381 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 823
Write 354
Mixed 540
SusWrite 430
119% 537 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 14.1
83% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 355
282% 407 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 103%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 14" 1280 720 AUOE7A6
Typical Vivobook Go E1404GAB_E1404GA Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1404GAB_E1404GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback