Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 278%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 286%
UFO
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics243% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 23 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221023
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 14:04
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700-$260
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 206
2-Core 411
122% 235 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,400
133% 1,100 Pts
64-Core 1,878
116% 1,878 Pts
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$727
Palit(1569 F296) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3240 MHz, MLim: 5374 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
243% Outstanding
Lighting 348
Reflection 351
Parallax 370
284% 356 fps
MRender 485
Gravity 314
Splatting 225
266% 341 fps
Poor: 208% ↑
This bench: 243%
 Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 1TB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200V9KL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1283 1386 1458 1490 1489 1459 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1517
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 1,428
328% 1,457 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 96.9
334% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,695
DQ Write 1,344
DQ Mixed 1,536
1,145% 1,525 MB/s
Poor: 224% ↑
This bench: 319%
 Great: 514%
Xraydisk 512GB 512GB
319GB free
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 16 51 44 8.1 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42% Average
Read 504
Write 238
Mixed 15
SusWrite 30.6
42% 197 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 4.1
73% 18 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 186%
Fanxiang S790 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3433 4156 4145 4152 4155 3515 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
590% Outstanding
Read 4,374
Write 4,539
Mixed 3,257
SusWrite 3926
906% 4,024 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 97.4
343% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,787
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 1534
1,153% 1,550 MB/s
Poor: 267% ↑
This bench: 590%
 Great: 589%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
157% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 64.5
MC Mixed 55.8
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 45.6
SC Write 61.3
SC Mixed 52.2
152% 53 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 132% ↑
This bench: 157%
 Great: 202%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 15 144 34.8" 1280 720 MTK85FF NQ3488
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $492Bench 117%, 6,945 samples39x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $259Bench 112%, 3,546 samples21x
Ryzen 5 7600XAMD  $199Bench 110%, 4,061 samples20x
GPU
RTX 4070Nvidia  $500Bench 190%, 91,697 samples13x
RTX 4070-TiNvidia  $727Bench 240%, 46,082 samples11x
RTX 4070-S (Super)Nvidia  $590Bench 215%, 14,993 samples10x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 385%, 327,441 samples9x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples8x
SFYRS1000G 1TBKingstonBench 389%, 17,374 samples8x
RAM
Fury DDR5 6000 C36 2x16GBKingston  $118Bench 180%, 16,861 samples7x
TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GBG.SKILL  $83Bench 173%, 39,467 samples6x
KF560C40-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 146%, 1,375 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback