Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220726
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 14:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 795
74% 614 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 281 280 275 277 272 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 484
Mixed 460
SusWrite 287
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 56.2
186% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
383GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 466 465 464 458 406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 464
Mixed 409
SusWrite 454
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 49
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 292
241% 346 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 31.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 50 0" 1280 720
Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback