Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180714
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 14:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 211
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 494 476 451 448 448 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 764
Mixed 619
SusWrite 472
168% 756 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 33.6
124% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 154
172% 306 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 131%
Great: 377%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 90 87 86 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 44.4
Write 72.7
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 89.1
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 16.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 16.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 265 122 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0700
Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback