Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-HG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 14:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 96
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 168
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 246
35% 256 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 140
Parallax 204
101% 156 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 140
Splatting 93.4
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tronos 120GB 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8341c75
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 448
Write 156
Mixed 190
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 15
78% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 63.6
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 42.7
40% 60.8 MB/s
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$17
227GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 63 66 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 64.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 65.1
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 PHL0001 Philips
Typical H81M-HG4 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback