Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SFG14-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Coral_RTH
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 60
1-Core 191
2-Core 346
102% 199 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 931
96% 775 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1699) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 16.3
11% 17.4 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 27
Splatting 0.2
12% 16.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8SEP4512Q-AA 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI00111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1991 2015 2015 1236 380 380 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,289
Write 1,639
Mixed 1,485
SusWrite 1,336
377% 1,688 MB/s
4K Read 54.1
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 24.9
236% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 740
667% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 291%
Great: 285%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 49.7
MC Mixed 46.6
136% 47.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 22.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4181
Typical Swift SFG14-71 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acer Swift SFG14-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback