Today's hottest deals

Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 924
90% 741 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.6% Excellent
Lighting 85
Reflection 131
Parallax 169
69% 129 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 90.9
Splatting 159
123% 150 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN17595
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 407 435 439 437 438 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 455
Mixed 418
SusWrite 429
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43.6
158% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 233
172% 222 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD16GSD43200-SI 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 15% 48 211 57 180 23.8" 1280 720 GSM5C90 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback