Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 185
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 431
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 19.6
12% 16 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 13.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 374 341 291 300 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 1,002
Mixed 957
SusWrite 352
189% 842 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 31.3
125% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 517
360% 439 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 16% 43 68 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0036
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback