Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 12 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,068
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 175
Parallax 170
154% 178 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$144
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 903 1050 1050 1027 1032 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1530
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,341
SusWrite 963
294% 1,307 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 80
263% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 944
708% 952 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 245%
Great: 537%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
444GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 240 233 233 239 238 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 470
Mixed 443
SusWrite 225
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 54.3
177% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 292
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
449GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 161 161 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 148
Write 154
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 157
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 11% 57 218 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback