Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M S2H  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$126
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 86.1
1-Core 164
2-Core 328
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 909
99% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 236
Parallax 397
160% 276 fps
MRender 377
Gravity 166
Splatting 302
231% 282 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 167%
Great: 178%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
A400 960GB 960GB
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 422 434 444 440 445 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 445
Mixed 420
SusWrite 433
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 32.7
156% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 47.7
95% 184 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 32.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 180 23.8" 1280 720 HCS0238 GB2420FFPLUS
Typical GA-A520M S2H Builds (Compare 1,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback