Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82XV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82XV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240620
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 69
1-Core 181
2-Core 365
105% 205 Pts
4-Core 726
8-Core 1,237
119% 981 Pts
64-Core 2,078
129% 2,078 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3C90) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 29.5
21% 28.7 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 23.2
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 23%
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3C90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.83
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 148
Parallax 135
100% 135 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 89.9
97% 124 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ4X112N 1TB
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,746
Write 3,187
Mixed 1,957
518% 2,297 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 44.5
261% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,394
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,249
928% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 49
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 27.4
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 133%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AE3
Typical 82XV Builds (Compare 1,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback