Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 155
2-Core 299
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 885
91% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,086
67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
Driver: atidx9loader64.dll Ver. 32.0.11037.4004
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 127
Parallax 158
68% 123 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 148
96% 112 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 512G 512GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400fAA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.6 33 9.1 5.8 5.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 2,654
Write 18.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 10.9
140% 674 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
111% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 136%
Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 42.8
SC Mixed 31.4
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 240 24.5" 1280 720 GPR0040 INTENSE X40
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback