Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Pro Q670M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 193% UFO	Desktop 109% UFO	Workstation 198% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus Pro Q670M-C (all builds)
Memory	57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 02 '24 at 13:29
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12600K-$155 101,563 User benchmarks, average bench 109% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 76.6 1-Core 189 2-Core 375 111% 214 Pts	4-Core 723 8-Core 1,197 117% 960 Pts	64-Core 1,745 108% 1,745 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 117%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gainward(10B0 2206) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 561.09 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	184% Outstanding	Lighting 268 Reflection 327 Parallax 267 219% 288 fps	MRender 286 Gravity 223 Splatting 170 179% 226 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 204 194 189 184 176 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 467 Mixed 392 SusWrite 214 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 52.5 185% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 339 255% 342 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB 10,369 User benchmarks, average bench 458% 2TB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4257 4903 4915 4916 4918 5082 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	612% Outstanding	Read 2,499 Write 3,777 Mixed 3241 SusWrite 4,832 817% 3,587 MB/s	4K Read 68.1 4K Write 316 4K Mixed 129 436% 171 MB/s	DQ Read 2,053 DQ Write 1,623 DQ Mixed 1,811 1,362% 1,829 MB/s
Poor: 278% ↑ This bench: 612% Great: 614%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	158% Outstanding	MC Read 61.8 MC Write 64.8 MC Mixed 58.9 177% 61.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 46.8 SC Mixed 31.2 94% 32.7 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 129% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 168%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	360	24.5"	1280 720	LEN66CC Y25g-30

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro Q670M-C Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 110%

UFO

Workstation 121%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro Q670M-C

CPU
Core i7-12700IntelBench 108%, 25,535 samples	7x
Core i9-12900KIntel $265Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	5x
Core i5-12600KIntel $155Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	5x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 8%, 36,283 samples	6x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x
Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWDBench 449%, 54,201 samples	4x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	3x

RAM
CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 2x16GBCrucialBench 148%, 1,654 samples	4x
KF548C38-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 152%, 3,734 samples	3x
CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GBCrucialBench 155%, 880 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $379

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350