Today's hottest deals

Monster TULPAR T6 V2.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T6 V2.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T6 V2.1
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240319
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 54.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 301
86% 168 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 904
84% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,501
93% 1,501 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 74%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A762) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 186
Parallax 184
13% 129 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 156
Splatting 124
141% 180 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 399 446 358 386 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,541
Write 2,116
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 498
328% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 71.8
260% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 647
DQ Mixed 1,001
721% 941 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 213%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 48.2
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 46.4
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 12 240 16" 1280 720 TMX1601 TL160ADMP11-0
Typical TULPAR T6 V2.1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

System: Monster TULPAR T6 V2.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback