Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82WU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82WU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 258
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 513
58% 452 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 384D) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 17.7
10% 16.4 fps
MRender 18.1
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 15.6
14% 18 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL41T0HBLB-00BL2 1TB
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 843 811 920 899 900 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,164
Write 888
Mixed 1,020
SusWrite 865
221% 984 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 36.6
157% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 521
397% 548 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 172%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 51.3
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 25.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 130%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 20 60 14" 1280 720 LEN8AAB
Typical 82WU Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82WU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback