Today's hottest deals

Megaport 202583

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 days ago, 10 days ago.
SystemMegaport 202583  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:21
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 282
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 869
89% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 56.4
40% 61.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 45.9
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 53 23 57 9.6 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 479
Write 317
Mixed 343
SusWrite 56.3
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 25.7
129% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 77.3
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 35.2
73% 141 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 116 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 126
Mixed 122
SusWrite 120
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 IVM610D PL2482H
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback